Resolved Markets logoResolved Markets logo
Abstract blue gradient background with a soft light streakAbstract blue gradient background with a soft light streak
Research

How markets price the final minutes before resolution

Short-dated BTC Up/Down contracts converge to 0 or 1 as the clock runs out. With millisecond snapshots and the spot price stamped on every record, the exact shape of that convergence becomes measurable.

8 min read · Updated Jun 22, 2026

  • 5m · 15m · 1h · 1dTimeframes
  • Per snapshotResolution clock
  • 0-1 probabilityPrice units
  • Stamped per recordSpot price

A 5-minute BTC Up/Down contract has a brutally clear deadline: at the bell, BTC is either above the strike or it is not, and the contract settles at 1 or 0. The interesting part is the path, how the implied probability behaves on the way to that certainty. With per-snapshot timestamps and spot stamped on every record, that path is measurable rather than anecdotal.

This is a research piece, so the standard applies: every claim should be a number you could reproduce, and we are explicit about what the data can and cannot tell you.

The shape of convergence

Line up every snapshot of a market against its countdown to resolution and a consistent shape emerges. The implied probability hugs the middle while the outcome is genuinely uncertain, then snaps decisively toward 0 or 1 in the final stretch as spot drifts away from the strike. The number worth measuring for your own strategy is the crossover, how late the market stays "uncertain" before it commits.

Mid-life: undecided

While the outcome is genuinely uncertain, the implied probability hovers near the middle and barely commits either way.

  • Odds near 0.5
  • Two-sided book
  • Low conviction

Final stretch: the snap

As spot drifts away from the strike, the probability moves sharply toward 0 or 1, the market making up its mind in seconds.

  • Decisive move
  • Spot-driven
  • Crossover point
Be honest about the data

We capture the book, not the oracle

Crypto contracts are captured at roughly 20 Hz, so the final-second path is densely sampled, but the literal settlement print comes from Polymarket, not from us. For convergence studies that distinction matters: we can show you exactly how the odds moved, right up to the edge of resolution, and we say plainly where our record ends.

Finding the crossover point

The single most useful number in a convergence study is the crossover, the moment the market stops sitting on the fence and commits to an outcome. Pin it down by lining each snapshot up against its countdown to resolution and tracking when the implied probability leaves the undecided middle and heads decisively for 0 or 1. Do that across many markets and the crossover stops being one anecdote and becomes a distribution you can reason about.

  • event_timestampWhen Polymarket emitted the change
  • capture_timestampWhen we processed it, latency, no lookahead
  • mid_priceThe implied probability you are tracking
  • crypto_priceSpot reference stamped on every record
  • crypto_price_age_msHow fresh that spot read was
  • ~20 HzSampling density into the final seconds

Because spot is stamped on every record alongside the odds, you are not guessing why the market moved, you can line the implied probability up against BTC drifting toward or away from the strike and see the two move together.

Why the path matters for trading

Late entries

If the market stays near the middle until very late, there is a window to trade a directional spot read the book has not fully priced.

  • Identify the crossover point
  • Compare odds to spot drift
  • Act before the snap

Spread blow-out

As certainty rises, market makers widen. Liquidity that was there at minute one may be gone at the last second.

  • Depth thins into the bell
  • Wider spreads near resolution
  • Size against real depth

Settlement risk

A contract at 0.95 is not 1.00. That gap is the market pricing the chance spot whips back across the strike.

  • “Decided” isn’t settled
  • Tail risk is priced
  • Mind the last-second flip

That is the whole point of keeping the history: a question about how markets behave becomes something you can chart and defend, not an opinion you have to take on faith.

Studying it across many markets

One market is a story; hundreds of markets are a finding. The convergence shape only earns trust when it holds across a large basket of resolved contracts, and that is precisely where keeping closed markets queryable pays off, you are not limited to whatever happens to be live the day you look.

No survivorship bias

Closed and expired markets stay in the archive, so a batch study samples the full population, not just the survivors.

  • Query resolved contracts
  • Full snapshot history kept
  • Sample hundreds of markets

Aligned by countdown

Re-index every market on its time-to-resolution and the individual paths stack into one comparable curve.

  • Common time axis
  • Per-snapshot clock
  • Compare like with like

Across timeframes

Compare how 5m, 15m, 1h, and 1d contracts converge, the snap is sharper the shorter the clock.

  • 5m · 15m · 1h · 1d
  • Different convergence speeds
  • One method, four regimes

Replay a market for yourself

Step through a resolved market snapshot by snapshot in the Replay Terminal, or read how point-in-time and time-range queries expose the path.

Frequently asked questions